National Center for Technology Innovation
 

Cheryl Volkman, Co-Founder & CEO Emeritus, AbleNet

4 comments 4 comments

Meet Cheryl Volkman

Cheryl Volkman photo
Co-Founder & CEO Emeritus,
AbleNet


Inquiries:
» AbleNet Website
» 1-800-322-0956 (U.S. & Canada)
» 1-651-294-2200 (international)

Profile Written by: Eric Morrison

The Company and the Technology

AbleNet is a company to watch given a unique business model that seeks to incorporate content and curriculum; software; assistive technology (communication devices, switches, messaging aides, and more); and professional training into a single seamless solution for schools. Moreover, it is blazing trails with very successful penetration into global markets that comprise 25% of its sales in a steep growth curve. AbleNet’s products are aimed primarily at students with severe/ profound to moderate disabilities, but the company also accounts for broad applicability to various populations.

Cheryl Volkman is now CEO Emeritus after 22 years as CEO and Co-Founder of AbleNet. She continues to provide leadership in the AT industry, serving on the Assistive Technology Industry Association board, in mentoring roles with other businesspeople, and is leading an external research effort at AbleNet.

Cheryl passionately outlines a new corporate concept that naturalistically embeds technology into directed teaching content permitting teachers to develop skill in the implementation of technology concomitantly as they engage in every-day planning and teaching—not as a separate activity. Recommendations and technological embedding at all levels of sophistication are built-in, making professional development part of the technology package. The program is called the AbleNet Student Achievement Program (ASAP). She indicates that some of the largest school districts in the country are using the curriculum and assistive technology. When they purchase the ASAP, instead of just curriculum or assistive technology separately, they get an integrated and supported relationship with AbleNet.

Schools appreciate the ASAP concept because they are purchasing a long term solution that includes curriculum, assistive technology, professional development and financing support. Securing this relationship means that the teachers get what they need from day one to help support their efforts in gaining student achievement. The professional development includes electronic media, learning communities, data management training, web based support, video support and program satisfaction data that goes to administrators so that they know how the ASAP is working in their schools. This comprehensive approach allows us, over time, to continually improve the fidelity of implementation of the programs and the assistive technology to achieve results.

Education and Technology—Together

A substantial basis for AbleNet’s success involves the AbleNet staff capacity to think and act both as savvy business people and as educators. Cheryl’s speech is peppered with terms like ‘leveraging’ and ‘cost analysis,’ yet in speaking about kids and the genesis of Star Reporter, a blend of AT and curriculum that builds literacy and communication through the natural desire of kids to pretend they are reporters, she talks like a teacher setting up an IEP:

We always have the classroom in mind. We’re always looking for the holes—in other words, what are our students not doing that other kids are doing and how can we help them fill those gaps?

This change-agent role involves patience and guidance in helping teachers understand how technology unleashes latent talent:

We had a couple of teachers when we first came out with Star Reporter curriculum and MEville to WEville literacy and communication curriculum that struggled with the concepts and expectations for students. In some cases the administrative team decides which curriculum will be used for the district. In these cases the teachers have little choice of what to use. A call we received from a teacher said, “I have tell you that I need to apologize. I was wrong and the worst thing about working with your curriculum right now is that I have to reassess my kids… I had no idea that they already understood as much as they did…The instructive methods in your programs helped them demonstrate their understanding. This is so exciting, thanks for supporting me in learning new ways to teach.”

Determining User Needs

At AbleNet, the visualization process that gave rise to initial products has been expanded as a major input for development:

In recent years we have also visualized what’s happening in the district. We’re not just looking at the teacher or therapist, we’re looking at the whole district: the superintendent, the special education director, the whole system has to be effective in order to make real change at the student level.

The company is using electronic survey tools to gather substantial information, and feels their focus on administrator positions is valid given the core issues that they have discovered through consistent market research methods. She explains,

Administrators like everyone else, work on the biggest, most painful issues. If a company understands the needs, they can figure out what solutions to offer, based on their core competency. For example, special education directors field a lot of complaints that come from parents who are unhappy with some aspect of the system. They are often involved in some level of dissatisfaction or actual due process efforts that take time. To address this issue, we’ve embedded techniques for our families to be involved in the curriculums.

We include template letters to use for all families which are involved with our curriculums. All the teacher has to do is copy it off, write in the parents’ names and send it home to gather items like the students favorite things or favorite foods, etc. The items are then used in the instruction for the next day. The parents are informed, they understand what the instruction is teaching and as a result they are actually involved in the curriculum. The process and engagement can be really fun for everyone. When that happens, it can change the atmosphere of the classroom and the process of educating children with very significant challenges.

Cheryl also stresses that market data that is broad and sound is essential for AT companies. An early study AbleNet developed indicated that 85% of teachers with special education students with more severe needs also had students with moderate needs in their classroom.

If we’re going to serve teachers, we knew we could not focus on just the students with the most significant disabilities, we have to focus on the whole classroom. This teacher is trying to juggle all of these needs and we knew we needed to support her with much more holistic solutions.

Emphasizing the importance of matching the conceptual image of the product with the activities and vocabulary of the real consumer, she continues,

In that study (in 1999) we also asked teachers about how literacy was taught in the classroom. Overwhelmingly teachers said, “We don’t teach literacy.” They defined literacy as reading and writing, not teaching the early basics of reading and writing.” There was a mismatch in terminology. As a result, we didn’t use the word literacy (in regard to) our products for many years; we used the term ‘learning’ instead. Otherwise, teachers would not have seen the products relating to their students. This view has changed of course, but terminology is very critical to understand and appreciate.

AbleNet partnered with NCTI to analyze the market research data gathered with administrators. The result is knowledge to share with the entire AT and consumer field – in joint presentations such as webinars and embodied in the Consumer Guide (PDF), which accompanies the TechMatrix.

Regulatory Environment

Cheryl embraces regulation, emphasizing that, “‘No Child Left Behind’ has been a really positive engine for us.” For AbleNet, proving efficacy has been a company credo from the beginning, and she feels regulation has only recently caught up with them in this regard, offering new levels of opportunity:

We have data collection forms in all of our curricula, and I can say that we will soon be delivering an (electronic) system that will allow districts to be able to gather data very effectively for their special education students. If we can’t help our schools meet their Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements, as well as doing evidence-based research, we won’t be successful. We want to be a leader for systems change.

Globalization in AT

Supported heavily by foreign vendors, whom AbleNet views as true partners, the company scans intensively for changes in the global regulatory environment and implements changes before new regulations go into effect, leading to smooth commerce. The ability to take orders on the web has also contributed to ease in marketing, and she applauds the European Union for setting the stage for change. She credits the E.U. for a large reduction in protectionism in the form of exclusivity agreements demanded by vendors and for essential consistency across markets:

Thank goodness the local economies have shifted so that you’re not having to work with each country individually in Europe. In the early days we didn’t trademark or patent our products in other countries because you had to do it in each individual country—our company wasn’t big enough to justify that expense. Now you can do it for the whole European Union which has made is much more cost effective.

There are differences that must be accounted for in international business, however:

One difference is the language barriers. The other is that many of the other countries have a national health care plan. Money goes to purchase the assistive technology through a totally different funding mechanism. Often the recommendation for technology goes through a medical model system where (a third party agent) will look at what the user needs and then recommend the equipment. That changes things for us a little bit because in the US we look at our technology as more of a classroom tool providing access to the curriculum. Over there we’re looking more at providing access in and of itself for communication and for participation.

Cheryl indicates that developing content for overseas markets is profoundly difficult due to language and lack of standardization in curriculum, and explains AT is treated much more like durable medical equipment. One potential advantage of this view is that vendors tend to look very flexibly at applications for consumers from birth to senior life, broadening sales opportunities. She credits hiring a Director of International Business as a move by the company that has contributed substantively to the explosive growth in international sales and for ensuring that distant vendors feel connected and supported. There have even been opportunities for emerging technology discoveries that have been licensed by AbleNet, offering a competitive advantage.

On Collaboration

Cheryl expresses that collaboration is inseparable from every step of development and marketing, believing that working with students and watching what they do is the foundational collaboration. Given this, she laments that there are some barriers involved with working directly with schools as a fundamental partnership for research, discovery of needs, and outcomes assessment. She cautions generally against insularity:

If you’re really creative, you can discover ways to work with others. Stay with your core competencies. Leverage those and help others to do the same. It makes collaboration easier. Often partners think that they can do everything and therefore they don’t want to come to the table. They want the whole pie rather than a slice of it, and that restricts opportunities.

She applies that warning especially to companies thinking about global business, indicating there is an inherent risk of losing that sense of core competency in the process of expansion. She feels that protectionism is generally declining, and adds,

That’s going to be good for our industry over time: the whole industry is kind of disjointed even though it’s very small in comparison to the consumer market. By working with partners, instead of developing one-off products or solutions, you’re going to see people starting to develop better systems that will be better supported. I think that people have to be very smart about that. There’s a lot of fear about losing intellectual property. We’re working with colleges and universities right now, too, and IP is seen as a big issue and often a barrier that cannot be resolved.

In decades of work in the AT industry, Cheryl has learned it is essential to understand the motivations of partners and not to assume that they are all the same. Continuing with partnerships with universities, she shares that some of her learning:

One of the most important things for university professors and researchers is that they can publish the results of their efforts. Even though people had told me that before, it wasn’t until we started partnering seriously that I really heard that motivation and understood why it was so important. I kept thinking, from a business perspective, that they would want a bigger cut of whatever we were producing with their advice and knowledge… if you don’t understand this need, you may not pursue a collaboration with key people because you’ll just assume they won’t do it without a significant royalty.

She indicates that successful collaborations become known and generate still more opportunities for partnership. She cautions, though, that an immediate assessment of direction and fit is essential:

I think another thing in creating a successful collaboration is that you do your homework. You need to make sure it will be a good business decision from the outset, or you will end up scrapping the project down the line. If it goes relatively smoothly, you continually get green lights in the process—then you know you’ve got a good partner at the right time. If you start to get red lights and it’s really hard, then often the “hard” continues. You should then let it go before you both work too much on it. It is important not to lose potentially good partners.

Her long-term experience suggests further shifts in the AT industry in regard to collaboration, as she explains:

It’s really exciting to see some of the partnerships that are occurring. Initially, there was a big worry about what Microsoft and other big guys would do in our industry. Many thought they would compete directly with us. Instead, I think they have proven that they want to leverage what we know and work with us to increase the delivery of solutions and they are helping to improve lives by leveraging their technology and partnering with us.

A Successful Partnership

Image of Weekly Reader newsletter

Download Sample Issue (PDF)

One of AbleNet’s recent coups is a partnership with Weekly Reader, a respected publisher of subscription-based educational content. Through the partnership, content is made available directly to the special education classroom through AbleNet’s technologies, successfully leveraging the competencies of both companies. As Cheryl explains:

We look at the classroom through our view of assistive technology being embedded in really good content. We also continue to consider universal design for learning. We have always focused on trying to make sure that the students we serve are included in that universal design—but they’re often not a part of the equation. They might be from a philosophical perspective, but rarely from a pragmatic perspective. We asked, “What is some great content that is already being delivered into the classroom that we could align with, that is research-based, and connected to grade level standards?”
Image of Word Web exercise from the Weekly Reader

Word Web Exercise from the Weekly Reader (PDF)

Striking a positive note in regard to both the potential for fearless collaboration and evolution in student capability, AbleNet concluded, “Weekly Reader is a great example of a large, hundred year-old company in the consumer market.”

Cheryl continues the story:

“Instead of worrying about them,” we said, “We have something to offer you.” Being able to leverage what they do and what we do is just a beautiful story. I think more and more the assistive technology manufacturers, aligned with expectations from No Child Left Behind and its future revisions, can make a difference. It will continue to take serious collaborations, deep listening and creative solutions to get system level change that will support greater student achievement. We are excited to be part of the journey.

Bookmark and Share

VN:F [1.0.9_379]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
Topics assigned: Innovators

CommentsWhat's this?


4 responses to “Cheryl Volkman, Co-Founder & CEO Emeritus, AbleNet”

14 01 2008
Heidi Silver-Pacuilla (16:52:25) :

Cheryl recently hosted a webinar on these topics through the Moving Forward with Technology series offered by the Center for Implementing Technology in Education (CITEd: http://www.cited.org/index.aspx). See the archived webinar at http://www.cited.org/index.aspx?page_id=126.

Here are some questions webinar participants posed:

1. How did you select administrators to interview and are you still in the process of interviewing administrators?

2. Are there good, simple demonstrations that can be used to inform and break down walls to using technologies to help students meet state standards? Michigan is new to the state standards game and many educators are struggling with understanding how alternative delivery and access to the content can be implemented.

VN:F [1.0.9_379]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
15 01 2008
Cheryl Volkman (15:35:54) :

We selected the administrators in a number of ways. The first was to contact districts in our immediate area who used our products and curriculums. Even though teachers and therapists were familiar with us, we did not personally know the administrators we interviewed. Then, we set up interviews any time we were in an area for a tradeshow or meeting of any kind. Several times we looked up titles of people we wanted to interview, found the name and phone number and cold called to set up interviews. Others were done at tradeshows and made connections that were cost effective for us, yet made sure we collected data from a variety of responsibility levels, a variety of different sized districts and in different areas of the country. We continue our interviews.

VN:F [1.0.9_379]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
16 01 2008
Cheryl Volkman (15:47:11) :

The answer for the second question will be a bit longer. I did a few searches on the internet with key words I thought would provide more pragmatic information or demonstrations and found very little on this topic. I think that tells us that many people in many states are struggling with this topic as well. Therefore, I will provide you with a few resources I think will provide you with some examples. Then, I suggest asking any manufacturers you work with the same question and talk to people in your state department of education who are assigned to this task. I assume there is a team put together to help lead the effort, maybe you could become part of the team.

The first resource I will recommend is the Consumers Guide that NCTI created which was a resource used in this webinar. It has a section on alignment that provides questions that administrators should ask vendors and vendors should ask administrators so great solutions can be offered to your classroom or district. Many manufacturers can answer this question regarding the products and curriculums they offer. You can find the consumer guide at http://www.techmatrix.org/, just click on the consumer guide on the top of the page.

Then, let me show you one example from AbleNet. We have an exclusive partnership with Weekly Reader to align the content they deliver to general education classrooms with two of their magazines: Weekly Reader Senior and Weekly Reader Addition 2. We literally rewrite the content to match the learning needs of students with severe/profound challenges and the needs of students with more moderate challenges and deliver the content on-line with lessons, a teacher’s guide, assistive technology solutions to assure all students participate in the instruction, reproducibles, etc.

The alignment becomes even more clear when you go to the Weekly Reader site http://www.weeklyreader.com/correlations. In the section is a wizard that allows you to enter the magazine you are going to use, the state you are from, the grade level content expectation, and the subject you are working on with your student. You then submit your detail and you get a display that tells you skill/goal that will be supported in the lessons you are getting that week in alignment with the standard (such as word recognition, comprehension, etc). Weekly Reader has done all of the work needed to make the alignments clear for every state and then we assure our content and instruction is created in total alignment with goals/skills and standards that Weekly Reader has developed for the specific magazine.

Another recommendation I would make at this time is to look into joining the QIAT listserve and/or the ATA listserve. You could ask this question to a very fine group of people and get see if their expertise would lead to other resources. You can google both organizations and get there quickly.

The last recommendation I would make is to consider buying the Journal for Special Education Technology. There are many great articles on this topic and related topics. The Council for Exceptional Children and TASH may also have resources for you, although I did not thoroughly search their websites.

VN:F [1.0.9_379]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
28 02 2008
Consumer Guides for School Administrators and Ed Tech Vendors (21:21:52) :

[...] They conducted market research to understand their new customer base. Read more about Cheryl Volkman’s leadership in the assistive and learning technology field in an NCTI  Innovator [...]

Tell us what you think or share your perspective.

You must be logged in to post a comment